Review: Superman: Action Comics Vol. 4: Metropolis Burning trade paperback (DC Comics)

 ·  15 comments

Superman: Action Comics Vol. 4: Metropolis Burning is kind of nuts, but I found it kind of nuts in the most refreshing way.

Writer Brian Michael Bendis is back with his unique dialogue patois, bringing it not just to Superman, the Justice League, and Young Justice, but also Lex Luthor, the Legion of Doom, and Bendis' prized creation Leviathan. Long-time comics artist John Romita delivers his signature style, all shading lines and blocky, immobile figures. Both writing and art are maniacally unpolished, and that’s even before a story that’s the equivalent of throwing a box of action figures at each other while simultaneously trying to shoehorn into the smallest continuity gap possible.

Of late I’ve been dissatisfied with a couple of DC books I’ve read, stories that often seem just marking time alongside sometimes a half-dozen or more mid-level artists on a single book, all offering dubious takes on DC’s staid, traditional house style. In Action Comics, Bendis is clearly Bendis and Romita is clearly Romita, and their work is both authentic and unapologetic. The creators' idiosyncrasies might fairly be called flaws, but I found this break from the everyday a treat. I would much prefer two creators bringing their own inimitable styles to the fore than others trying the same old tried-and-true with various degrees of success.

[Review contains spoilers for Action Comics and Superman]

Even though contemporaneous with the Man of Steel revealing his secret identity to the world over in Superman, Action is set — with no small amount of whiplash — a few days before. Astounding that Bendis is writing both books, and again to an extent it’s so insane that I can’t help but admire Bendis' gusto. Metropolis gets wrecked here — really, really wrecked, with Romita drawing giant arial damage shots — and all of this is as if it never happened in Superman, even as far as the two books' conceptions of Lex Luthor being slightly different. Further, even the Justice League Vol. 5: Justice/Doom War and Year of the Villain events that this story was supposed to precede were about done by now (and this collection was published well after those); to a certain extent Bendis gets his own mini-event here with all the trappings of Scott Snyder’s run-up to Dark Nights: Death Metal even as it doesn’t actually quite fit.

[See the latest DC trade solicitations.]

The differentiating factor is Bendis' Leviathan, who teams up with and then totally betrays and outmaneuvers Luthor and his Legion of Doom. Though I suspect no actual animosity between creators, this could be viewed as Bendis' recompense after his Event Leviathan miniseries was largely swept under the rug in favor of the aforementioned run-up to Death Metal; here, Bendis proves Leviathan a greater threat than those measly villains. It reads, again, like Bendis playing with all his action figures at once on the page, even those who don’t necessarily fit together, but there’s a base joy in that that’s hard to beat.

Almost five full issues of a hero and villain knocking each other around wouldn’t ordinarily find my favor, but Burning is more than that — it is the Justice League versus the Legion of Doom, and without any of the Perpetua trappings, giving it a significant Challenge of the Super Friends vibe. (How often, for instance, do we get to see Gorilla Grodd throwing Superman around?) I would almost venture this is more the Legion of Doom’s book than Superman’s, like one of James Tynion’s interstitial Doom issues in Justice League. The book is at its most priceless in the flashback scenes of Luthor trying to hold business negotiations with Leviathan while Brainiac, Grodd, Cheetah, and Sinestro chew the scenery behind him, the world’s greatest villains filtered through Bendis' hipster-banter machine. Bendis' Leviathan himself gets the longest speeches, the most lofty oration, making him a wet blanket over the proceedings, but clearly Bendis is entertained.

Another particularly strong quiet moment, early in the book, is when fire chief Melody Moore tells Clark Kent about her intention to run for mayor, and so some days before Clark reveals his identity to the world, he goes ahead and reveals it to her. Melody debuted in Bendis' Man of Steel miniseries and I don’t feel we’ve seen her near enough since then — frankly, I do wonder whether Bendis will be able to satisfactorily wrap up his overarching “Invisible Mafia” storyline altogether with just one more Action volume to go. I was just thinking the other day that it felt like Bendis had dropped the ball with the Melody character and here she is getting let in on Superman’s secret early; it’s not a development with much plot heft, but a nice indication that Bendis hasn’t forgotten all of what he’s set up.

Romita gets to draw a great cross-section of the DC Universe, even if many of the characters start and end the story unconscious in the rubble of Metropolis. Again, one can see the idiosyncrasies here as flaws or not; I think Romita’s style is just far enough on this side of “traditional” that the vacant stares or Grodd’s ever-evolving visage don’t get the same kind of passes we might give the absurdist styles of Kelley Jones or Riley Rossmo. But aside from the arm-and-leg-flailing fight scenes, Bendis also gives Romita (with inker Klaus Janson) plenty opportunity to draw darkened alleys and clandestine meetings with aplomb (as well as big bright explosions). Again I think Romita’s range and gusto speak volumes even if his work isn’t as compact as DC house style.

3

Rating

It would be easy to dismiss Brian Michael Bendis' Superman: Action Comics Vol. 4: Metropolis Burning because despite being ostensibly a big event (or at least having a lot of scope), it’s clear early on that even the writer himself won’t be making much it in favor of other big events he’s got going on in his other titles. That’s weird, and I’m not sure if it’s an indication of Metropolis Burning falling victim to DC’s other, shifting plans or if frenetic was just what Bendis was going for. Even so, when other books don’t seem to take risks, don’t seem to go for big screen bombastics in favor of not rocking the boat, I’m glad to see Bendis and John Romita putting their years in the business to good use here and not caring who sees it.

[Includes original and variant covers, script excerpt and pencils]

Comments ( 15 )

  1. Great review as always. Totally in synch with what I thought while reading this volume. It felt like an event in itself. Romita's style fit perfectly for this action packed story. As you said....it was all action figures being thrown at each other.

    Overall, I like what Bendis brought to Superman (though I still miss the younger version of Superboy that Tomasi and Gleason brought so vividly to life). Bendis really brought back a focus on Metropolis and Superman's supporting cast...but as you, I fear that he wasn't able to wrap up the storyline and we will get a rushed ending that tries to tie up loose ends. Case in point as you mention.....Melody Moore, a character that I thought had a lot of potential, but wasn't given nearly enough focus by Bendis through his run.....

    I have to say, that you can always recognize Bendis dialogue no matter what.....he does have that unique staccato rhythm to his words that no other writer has. It is annoying at times, but in this volume, I think for the most part it worked.

    Another annoying thing that DC did was switch these from hardcover to paperback....the "crazed" collector in me screams in agony...haha.....

    Looking forward to your next review.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was surprised DC did this one in paperback, especially since — correct me if I'm wrong — Superman Vol. 4: Mythological is still in hardcover.

      Delete
    2. Penguin Random House's website is still calling it a hardcover, but the US$ 19.99 price point indicates otherwise. It was solicited by DC as a TPB.

      Delete
    3. Unfortunately Mythological is in TPB form.....they basically switched this from hardcover to TPB format, the same way they did Tomasi's Detective which is even worse, since it went from Hardcover to Paperback to Hardcover (with the Joker War tie ins) back to Paperback.....<>

      Delete
  2. JRJR needs a really strong inker, like Klaus Janson here, or the late Al Williamson on his Daredevil origin story with Frank Miller. Compare this Superman artwork to the much lesser artwork on Superman Year One, which could have been much better if it had had a better, bolder inker, and not someone who simply traced every fussy sketch line in JRJR's pencils.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a good point. True, Superman Year One was I believe inked by Danny Miki.....who is a really good inker in his own right, but just doesn't lift JRJR's pencils the way his long time associates do/did.

      Delete
    2. Couldn't disagree more with you guys. I think Miki's inks are much better than Janson's when it comes to texture and actually giving Romita's art some tridimensionality. His inks on All-Star Batman #1-5, coupled with Dean White's painterly coloring, made that arc Romita's best-looking DC work in my opinion.

      Whether he was trying to "clean up" Romita's lines on Action Comics or not, I think Janson's inks frequently made his art look sloppy and unfinished. The last few pages of issue #1,016, for instance, feature some of the ugliest Superman drawings I've ever seen. Issue #1,022, which will kick off the next volume, was guest-inked by Miki and it looks considerably better than any other Action issue Romita worked on.

      Delete
    3. Sorry, I meant issue #1,017, not #1,016 (which closed out the previous volume, drawn by Szymon Kudranski).

      Delete
    4. I love this conversation and I look forward to comparing inkers on #1017 vs. #1022.

      Delete
    5. Always good to hear different points of view. I think you make some fair points Shagamu. I will definitely be checking and comparing....:). I think when it comes down to it, it's personal preference....

      Delete
  3. yes-I loved the Bendis Superman and I am going to miss it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are in the minority. Everyone else hate Bendis on Superman and for good reason.

      Delete
    2. I also, as the review implies, loved the Bendis Superman and will miss it.

      Delete
    3. I have to chime in and say that I really loved the Bendis run as well. I think that he really built up the world of Superman, and it felt like the old triangle days when Action and Superman were tied together with stories that focused on both the big moments and the small.

      Delete
    4. AnonymousJune 08, 2021

      I loved it as well and was sad to see it end. He seemed to anger a lot of people by aging up Jonathan, but I thought it was handled pretty well, although I haven't been the biggest fan of Bendis' Legion run. It also hasn't stopped Tomasi from putting out more Super Sons adventures (which I feel have diminishing returns at this point). Besides, it's comics, so someone will likely de-age him at some point anyway.

      Delete

To post a comment, you may need to temporarily allow "cross-site tracking" in your browser of choice.

Newer Post Home Older Post