Again, if I’d never read that Phillip Kennedy Johnson’s “Warworld Saga” was the best thing since “Death of Superman,” if DC hadn’t seemingly rushed out a Superman: The Warworld Saga compendium (and good on them for doing so either way), perhaps my expectations for this story wouldn’t have been so high and it would have landed better for me.
Superman: Action Comics Vol. 3: Warworld Revolution and the books that preceded it are certainly good Superman, absolutely nothing to be ashamed of, and I still look forward to Johnson’s run on a more Metropolis-based Superman. But I can’t say that I thought “Warworld Saga” showed me a lot about Superman that I didn’t already know, and particularly Johnson doesn’t seem to be able to do much with Superman’s supporting cast in this series (whether or not Johnson chose them or they came by editorial fiat).
None of the volumes have lived up to the exemplar Superman: Action Comics Vol. 1: Warworld Rising, but again I’m hopeful maybe being earthbound again will do the trick.
[Review contains spoilers]
Though this is very much trees for the forest, I’d be remiss at the top if I didn’t recognize that in the otherwise-unnecessary “World Without Clark Kent” backup story that DC includes here, Johnson brings back Kenny Braverman — Conduit! Last seen in 1995’s “The Death of Clark Kent,” Braverman was a snarling, melodramatic villain of his time, but he’s become something of a cult classic for me given that no writer has picked him up again in almost 30 years (and even despite that he got an action figure!). Johnson’s portrayal does nothing really to redeem Conduit — whether the “kewl” slang Johnson gives Conduit is a nod to his original portrayals or Johnson’s own bad judgment, I’m not sure — but having the villain in play again was a great surprise. There’s nowhere to go but up.
[See the latest DC trade solicitations.]
As I mentioned in my review of Superman: Action Comics Vol. 2: The Arena, Johnson doesn’t do much to complicate the “Superman goes to disaffected civilization and teaches them about hope” trope — indeed Superman arrives on Warworld, indeed they’re unmoved, but the more Superman talks, the more they fall in line. At least part of what feels missing is that, for all the Warzoons call Superman “the Unbloodied Sword,” Johnson skips over how Superman manages to be peaceful and set an example for the Warzoons on a planet trying to kill him (are we meant to have looked to some of the Future State books for this? I vaguely remember).
In this volume too, after Mongul’s deposed, the Warzoons will apparently just govern themselves peacefully after centuries of warfare. Johnson doesn’t have the pages for all the political ramifications (and who knows, maybe that’s waiting for me one issue hence in Superman: Kal-El Returns), but I was surprised we didn’t get at least a hint of what happens next. As I’ve felt through much of this, Johnson focuses more on the broad strokes than the fine details, when what we need is a balance between.
Take, for instance, that among key conflicts is the early death of Lightray Lia Nelson (Tangent Earth doppleganger, thanks Grant Morrison) and how that turns OMAC to Mongul’s side in hopes of bringing her back. I recall we got something of an origin for the new Lightray in Morrison’s Superman and the Authority, but I’m stymied who this OMAC is. One of Mongul’s minions suggests there’s some significance to OMAC’s identity, and I’ll likely go see if there’s any hints in Authority after I finish this writing, but given that Authority isn’t included in the Superman: The Warworld Saga collection, it hardly seems fair that it should be this book’s required reading. As such — Johnson means for us to feel deeply for Lightray and OMAC, we’re meant to be engaged in OMAC’s transition from good to bad and back again, but the characters are complete ciphers to us the whole way through.
Central to the “Warworld Saga” is the chestnut that Superman does not kill; it is verily the point of the “Unbloodied Sword” battle cry. But though Superman doesn’t kill, his allies very much do, including Midnighter, who even in the end of this book kills a foe while quipping, “I’m not actually Superman.”
There’s some interesting complication here, from the fact that Superman brought allies with him whom he must have known would kill when his back was turned to the example set to the Warzoons when Superman doesn’t kill but then all the other Earth heroes do. I had hoped that Johnson might make something of this by the end, a confrontation between Superman and Midnighter or something, but he does not. Again, the pieces are all here, but they never come together into something more than the most surface-level Superman adventure, if still expansive and exciting.
I appreciate that seemingly DC includes a lot of “extras” among the “Warworld” books, including here the Action Comics Annual 2022. It’s another where Johnson does well, and with a powerhouse art team of Dale Eaglesham on the Mongul parts and Ian Churchill on the young Clark Kent parts. All on its own, Ma Kent’s struggle with cancer in Clark’s childhood is gripping enough, though again I think Johnson lets the needs of the plot outweigh sense, as when Martha apparently gets her chemo treatments in the middle of the night. Also good was the “Myth of Mongul” short with art by Will Conrad, proposing an origin for Mongul with appealing similarities to other mythologies of the DCU.
All told, despite my criticisms, I’m a fan of Phillip Kennedy Johnson’s Superman. I’d like to see more like the first volume with Superman getting in between the U.S. military and Atlantis than this, but equally at the end of Superman: Action Comics Vol. 3: Warworld Revolution, Johnson suggests some political trouble among the United Planets, and I’d be all for that, too. A fine jaunt, probably a good series as someone’s first or casual Superman reading; let’s see how things look after Dark Crisis.
[Includes original and variant covers]
I'm with you on this one -- fine Superman, but not a thirty-year peak for me. If it weren't the only Superman book on the stands at the time, I might not have hung on as long as I did. (Cosmic comics and sword-and-sorcery aren't my favorite genres, so this being a cosmic S&S take wasn't exactly my speed.) I'd just as soon reread the Jurgens/Tomasi Rebirth run than the Warworld Saga. Slightly curious how this reads all in one volume, but not $60 curious.
ReplyDeleteRe: Conduit, I was just as jazzed as you to see Kenny Braverman back in continuity. Once upon a time, Dan Jurgens revealed that Conduit was supposed to be a major player in Action Comics #1001 and beyond, but for the coming of Bendis. Mileage may vary on Bendis's run -- for my money, ultimately aimless but closer to the Triangle Era pacing and better for it -- but I can't believe there's not an audience for Jurgens to do more Conduit. Marvel's been doing a lot of retro-continuity books (Peter David on Hulk, J.M. DeMatteis on Spider-Man, etc), and I wonder why DC doesn't do more of that, especially with how well-regarded Mark Waid's return has been.
Jurgens, first time around, wrote and drew what will probably always be my definitive Superman. In the Jurgens/Tomasi era, not so much, and even I'd venture the moment had passed already by the time Conduit came around. So Jurgens on Conduit, I don't know; Johnson or Williamson on Conduit, I'm there. (I'd be there anyway. It's Conduit.)
DeleteWhile I agree with your assessment of PKJ's Warworld saga overall, I ended up liking it more than you seemed did. Or at least, it didn't bother me as much that PKJ did more telling than showing. I would have liked to see one or two issues devoted to Superman being thrown into the arena early on and figuring out how to survive without killing anyone. I would have liked to see him inspire the slaves and Warzoons more than just being told he is inspiring them. I also agree that it was hard to care for the Authority characters because no time was spent with them or showing their relationships to one another. From what I understand, the Warworld Saga trade includes a special and other issues that might fix that problem, but it doesn't change the fact that DC decided not to collect them in the first trades released.
ReplyDeleteThat said, I appreciate that PKJ had a story to tell, and he was able to tell it. Everything he set up in his first issues come to fruition. The breach creatures play a part. The mysterious stranger that helps Mongul is followed up on and his reveal is good. The Genesis stone plays an important role. The United Planets president going insane when he hears about the Phaelosians is explained. I feel like PKJ stuck the landing, even if it wasn't the smoothest ride getting there. That's more than I can say about Bendis. His plots about Jor-El, Rogol Zaar, the Circle, how Krypton was actually destroyed, etc. just kind of ended. It wasn't satisfying in anyway. Then his run is wrapped up abruptly and he's booted off the books when it felt like he still had stories to tell. It feels like no writer on the Superman book has been allowed to really end their run on their terms. The Rebirth creative teams got kicked off for Bendis. He got booted because of all the mess happening behind the scenes.
I also liked PKJ's worldbuilding. I'm not sure how much of what he established about Warworld was new and what had already been shown, but he made it feel like a living place with its own culture, history, and traditions. Not a nice place, but one that makes sense.
It was fun seeing Conduit again. I actually have his toy. I got it one year for Christmas along with Superboy, Steel, Superman, etc. It was nice to see a classic Superman villain, period. I realized that it has been a long time since we've seen a lot of Superman's Rogues gallery. Bendis mainly used his own creations, though he did throw Luthor in at the end. PKJ and Taylor have only used Lex and Mongul. I can't remember the last time we had a big Metallo story, or Parasite (other than the Uber Parasite that showed up for two issues at the end of Bendis's run), Brainiac, Silver Banshee, Reactron, Atomic Skull, Mannheim, Eradicator, Prankster, Toyman, etc.
I've really liked this era of Superman comics, with PKJ showing us Superman freeing a world of slaves while Taylor shows us a young hero trying to step into pretty big boots. I'm hoping the Dawn of DC era will be just as good for the Man of Steel.
-Kon30
> it has been a long time since we've seen a lot of Superman's Rogues gallery
DeleteI will unreservedly second this statement. Indeed, I would broaden that statement to the DCU writ large. Gotham has been inventing new villains and pushing the classic rogues out into their own books as borderline antiheroes. Flash is off fighting some new cosmic force, while the GL books are orbiting Sinestro again. Tom King's Wonder Woman has started to include some of the classics, but the main villain of the run is a new (and very Marston-ian) adversary; the previous runs seemed to keep cycling back just to Cheetah and Max Lord again and again.
There's hope on the horizon... Williamson has done a bit with Parasite, though it's definitely in service to his new Superman villains Graft & Pharma. Then we've got the looming specter of Brainiac, who's been a kind of post-credits tease for about a year now. Meanwhile, Chip Zdarsky's about to do a "Joker: Year One," which sounds both engaging and exhausting. But if the big bads of the DCU are currently Amanda Waller and Peacemaker, well...
Put another way, where have all the bad guys gone?
Kon brings up a good point that at least Johnson got to write a beginning, middle, and end, which is indeed rarer than it should be these days. I'd venture I'd have liked to see a little more of the terrestrial issues happening in Vol. 1: Warworld Rising reflected in the end, but certainly the second and third volumes dovetail nicely. And we can't discount that some of what's in Kal-El Returns might count as part of this story, though the Warworld Saga Compendium doesn't reflect such. (I read the specials and extras in the places the compendium put them, by the way, and did not find it added significantly much to these proceedings.)
Delete"Brainiac, Silver Banshee, Reactron, Atomic Skull, Mannheim, Eradicator, Prankster, Toyman" is a great list and brings back memories (c'mon, no love for Blaze or Mr. Z?). Another thing about the Triangle Titles was Superman's rogues felt like supporting cast — there was something going on with Lex or Brainiac or Mannheim, often fully independent of Superman himself. I'd love to see a title again with the kind of ensemble cast (and ensemble writers!) of the Triangle Titles.